Képminőség-ellenőrzés cikkek

Ebben a cikksorozatban elsősorban a síkműtárgyak digializálásának problémáival foglalkozunk. Ide tartozik a köz-, és magángyűjtemények anyagának jelentős része, festmények, rajzok, nyomatok, az arcívumok, levéltárak dokumentumai, térképek, a reflektív fotográfiák, tehát a papírképek, nagyítások, illetve a transzmisszív fotóanyagok, tehát negatívok, diák, üvegnegatívok. De a kötött dokumentumok, könyvek esetében is elengedhetetlen a tárgyak megbízható, kutatható digitális reprezentációja. A szakma minden szereplője profitál a megfelelő, szakszerű digitalizálás eredményeképpen keletkező magas minőségű digitalizális objektumok használatából.

Külső szakértőként, konzulensként közreműködünk az intézmények digiatlizálási gyakorlatának ellenőrzésében, fejlesztésében, optimalizálásában, segítséget nyújtunk a szakemberek továbbképzésében, illetve a nemzetközi gyakorlatnak megfelelő új munkafolyamat megtervezésében.

Első rész

Képminőség-ellenőrzés
a múzeumi digitalizálásban

A képminőség ellenőrzése a műtárgy-digitalizálás nélkülözhetetlen eleme. Az ISa Golden Thread eljárással a teljes munkafolyamat vizsgálható. A szabványoknak megfelelő digitális objektumok előállítása mindenki számára előnyökkel jár.

Part one

Image quality control
for cultural heritage digitization projects

Image quality control is an essential part of cultural heritage digitization process. The ISa Golden Thread method examines every element of the entire workflow, so the quality control using this tool can guarantee the adequacy of digitization.

Második rész

9600 dpi. Tényleg? — műtárgy-reprodukciók részletvisszaadása

A műtárgy-reprodukciók felbontás, élesség, részletvisszaadás ellenőrzése és mérése objektív, tudományos eszközökkel.

Part two

9600 dpi. Really? – Evaluation of detail reproduction

Measurement and evaluation of resolution, sharpness and detail reproduction using an objective, scientific method.

9600 dpi. Really?

Evaluation of detail reproduction, based on MTF and SFR curves

In the previous article, I wrote in general about cultural heritage digitization and the importance of image quality control. This paper will be about resolution, sharpness, detail reproduction and the method of its checking.

THE RESOLUTION

The resolution of a digital reproductions is determined by two things:

Sampling frequency – the maximum resolution that a camera or scanner can achieve, given in dpi (dots per inch) or ppi (pixels per inch). This is a theoretical upper boundary, and defines the quantity of delivered pixels.
Optical and image processing effects – lens design, properties of image sensor, focus, mechanical vibrations, RAW processing settings, sharpening, file compression, etc. This component determines the actual quality of reproduction.

In practice, this means that even if we set the maximum sampling frequency indicated by the manufacturer on the scanner or camera, the reproduction may not contain the required amount of details. We need to evaluate the digitization process, taking into account all its elements, to be sure that we are not creating an “empty resolution”. For institutional-level projects, a digitization with “empty resolution” means a waste of time, money, and other resources.

THE “EMPTY RESOLUTION”

It can be clearly seen that even though we increase the sampling frequency, the system tested in this example is not capable of a resolution higher than 300 dpi.

In this example 300 dpi is the highest value where we can still distinguish all five black lines. Scanning with a higher sampling frequency only produces “empty resolution” which means that the file size increases, but not the amount of reproduced details.

For institutional-level projects the digitization with “empty resolution” is an unacceptable waste of time, money, and other resources.

Source: Image Science Associates: GoldenThread Users Manual

SFR-MTF (Modulation Transfer Function / Spatial Frequency Response)

To evaluate image quality, detail rendering must be measured objectively. With these numerical values it is possible to set up quality requirements and we can also check their fulfillment.

Reproduction can be qualified by evaluating the MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) or SFR (Spatial Frequency Response) curve, and the calculated Sampling Efficiency. This evaluation takes into account all the mechanical, optical, electronic, and software elements of the reproduction process: the camera, the lens, the image sensor, the lighting, and then the settings in the RAW conversion software. Consequently this measurement quantifies how faithfully the reproduction renders the target chart.

The FADGI 4 Stars (preservation-grade) compliant digitization’s sampling efficiency should exceed MTF10 (SFR 10%) > 90%

MTF

The MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) to measure the contrast difference between the original and the digital image, so the MTF is the aspect ratio of the output and the ideal picture’s contrast.

Modulation transfer = Output modulation / Input modulation

SFR

SFR (Spatial Frequency Response) indicates how imaging systems are able to maintain contrast between increasingly finer details.

These functions represents the same properties of imaging systems, but with a different approach – the literature uses this two terms alternately; both be used to quantify the quality of detail reproduction.

Resolution measurement features of the Golden Thread System

In practice, the real resolution, sharpness and detail reproduction of digitization are measured by digitizing the specially developed test chart with the given capture device, and then the finished image is evaluated by a suitable software and the deviation of the reproduction from the ideal chart is quantified.

One of the most common image quality control systems in the international GLAM community (galleries, libraries, archives, museums) is the Golden Thread system of Image Science Associates. This system has multiple features to measure detail reproduction on reflective and transmissive targets.

Golden Thread Device Level Target resolution test features

A Golden Thread Device Level Target felbontásmérő eszközei ©ISa

Slanted square: slanted edges are used for vertical and horizontal SFR measurement and also to check the spatial misregistration of RGB color channels.
Resolution wedges: groups of lines with increasing frequency in horizontal, vertical, and diagonal directions, marked with dpi levels.
Ruled markings (in inches and centimeters): helps to calculate the magnification ratio and the relative resolution in Capture One CH.
Corner gray patches: to check for illumination uniformity.

The method and its scientific background

The purpose of the analysis is to determine the limiting resolution of the reprographic system.

On the resolution test wedges, there are 200, 300, 400…etc. lines per inch, marked with their dpi levels respectively. The cross-sections of the wedges are evaluated by a software by comparing the ideal brightness values of the reference wedge with the values measured on the reproduction.

The cross-section of black and white stripes on the theoretical, perfect wedge has a brightness value of 1 or 0. This generates a square signal.

On a reproduction, due to the imperfections of the reprographic system, the contrast decreases, so that the square signal will be distorted to a waveform.

Source: Image Science Associates: GoldenThread Users Manual

When tested at higher resolutions, the difference between the black and white brightness values will become smaller and smaller (i.e., the contrast will decrease), and finally, at the maximum resolution that the system can reproduce, the wedge bands will completely merge.

From the amplitude of the wave signal at different resolution values, the detail reproduction capability at given resolution can be read and quantified.

Source: Image Science Associates: GoldenThread Users Manual

The measured contrast values are normalized and transformed into a curve by the evaluation software using a mathematical function, the Fourier transform. Thus, we obtain the MTF/SFR curve, which characterizes the detail reproduction capabilities of the reprographic system.

The next figure may make it even easier to understand the MTF curve and its different behavior at low and high frequencies.

Source: Tim Zaman: Development of a topographical imaging device for the near-planar surfaces of paintings, MsC Thesis

FADGI guidelines specifies an expected value for the sampling efficiency at low and high frequency lines. And, of course, there are also different requirements for different types of originals.

A detailed description can be found in the public documentation of the standard.For example, FADGI 4 Stars sets the target resolution for reflective photographic materials (photos, enlargements) at 600 ppi. It accepts a range of 40-65% of Sampling Efficiency for medium frequency (MTF50) and >90% for high frequency (MTF10) details.

The requirements for transmissive photographic materials (negatives, slides) are similar, except for resolution, which is 3500 ppi [1] in this case, but other acceptable ranges are the same: MTF50 40%-65%, and MTF10> 90%.

Interpretation of the MTF curve with Golden Thread software

Source: Image Science Associates: GoldenThread Use and Interpretation Manual

There are three notable points to observe on the curve:

Amplitude values >1 – indicates the degree of over sharpening
Nyquist frequency – the amplitude read at half the target value
Limiting resolution – the value where the contrast drops below 0.1

The tolerances and limits required to achieve the various FADGI ratings are clearly visible.

For comparison, the MFT analysis of an inappropriate negative-digitization. It is visible that despite the 4000 dpi target resolution setting, the actual rendered details are 1000 dpi (horizontal) and 2000 dpi (vertical).

Source: Tepper, Aap: Mass Digitisation Quality Control Workflow: Photographic Negatives (Film Archives, The National Archives of Estonia)

Conclusion

Measurement and analysis of MTF (Modulation Transfer Function) and SFR (Spatial Frequency Response) is a scientifically recognized method for evaluation of detail rendering and image quality control in reprography because:

objective, thus precluding subjectivity arising from visual assessment,
takes into account all elements of the digitization process,
the measured values are comparable, to determine compliance with different standards,
the quality of digitization of both reflective and transmissive originals can be examined.

In addition to detail reproduction, the SFR curve quantifies several imaging features, such as sharpening, aliasing, color misregistration, and overall image quality.

Using the Golden Thread System it is possible to measure the true detail rendering capabilities and the image quality of digital reprographic systems and verify the compliance with international image quality standards.

Resources, links, further readings

Image Science Associates Resource Center http://www.imagescienceassociates.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=PAPERS&Store_Code=ISA001
FADGI – Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materials http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/guidelines/FADGI%20Federal%20%20Agencies%20Digital%20Guidelines%20Initiative-2016%20Final_rev1.pdf
Burns, Peter D. – Williams, Don: Sampling Efficiency in Digital Camera Performance Standards http://www.imagescienceassociates.com/mm5/pubs/Sampling_Efficiency_in_Digital_Camera_Performance_Standards.pdf
Williams, Don: What is an MTF? … and why you should care? http://www.imagescienceassociates.com/mm5/pubs/What_is_an_MTF_and_Why_You_Should_Care.pdf
Zaman, Tim: Development of a topographical imaging device for the near-planar surfaces of paintings, MsC Thesis https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:bd71a192-eaa8-4f90-8778-b18f86cac79c?collection=education
Tepper, Aap: Mass Digitisation Quality Control Workflow: Photographic Negatives (Film Archives, The National Archives of Estonia) https://www.museovirasto.fi/uploads/Kuvakokoelmat/Ajankohtaista/KAP2019/Tepper.pdf
DT Cultural Heritage: Digitization Program Planning https://heritage-digitaltransitions.com/product/cultural-heritage-digitization-planning-bundle-solutions-guide-digitization-program-planning-guide-pdf/
Phase One Cultural Heritage Resources https://www.phaseone.com/en/Cultural-Heritage/Resources

Contact

If you have any further questions, please reach out to me through the contact form: CONTACT

Daniel Horvath
freelance photography technology consultant

[1] The tolerance of 4000 ppi for transparent originals in the 2016 text was extended to 3500 ppi in 2019 at the suggestion of Don Williams.

9600 dpi. Tényleg?

Reprodukciók részletvisszaadásának értékelése
az MTF és SFR görbék alapján

Az előző cikkben általánosságban írtam a múzeumi digitalizálásról és a képminőség-ellenőrzés fontosságáról. Ebben az írásban a felbontás, élesség, részletvisszaadás ellenőrzéséről, és az ellenőrzés módjáról lesz szó.

A FELBONTÁS

A digitális reprodukciók felbontását két dolog határozza meg:

A mintavételezési sűrűség – ez a digitalizáló eszköz dpi-ben (dot per inch) vagy ppi-ben (pixels per inch) megadott jellemzője, az elérhető felbontás elméleti felső határa, tehát a maximálisan reprodukálható pixelek mennyisége.
Az optikai és képfeldolgozási folyamatok – többek között a digitalizáló eszköz optikai és elektronikai tulajdonságai, a fókusz, a mechanikai rezgések, a RAW feldolgozás beállításai, az élesítés, a fájltömörítés és minden egyéb körülmény, amelynek hatása van a részletvisszaadásra. Ez a komponens határozza meg a reprodukció tényleges minőségét.

Ez a gyakorlatban annyit jelent, hogy előfordulhat, hogy hiába állítjuk be a szkenneren vagy a kamerán a gyártó által feltüntetett maximális mintavételezési sűrűséget, a reprodukció nem feltétlenül fog annak megfelelő részletmennyiséget tartalmazni. A teljes digitalizálási folyamatot – annak minden elemét figyelembe véve – mérnünk kell, hogy biztosak lehessünk benne, hogy nem keletkezik „üres felbontás”.

Image Quality Standards for Cultural Heritage Digitization

Image quality standards for cultural heritage digitization projects

Why the quality control is so important?

Digitizing a collection is a Herculean task in terms of labour, costs, and mindshare. It requires a coordinated work of different departments and professionals, and the allocation of a huge amount of institutional resources. Therefore it is essential to be sure about its quality and efficiency.

To achieve good and useful digitization it is not enough to take some nice-looking, high-resolution photos, but the digitization process has to result a standardized, quality-controlled container, including qualified images and metadata: a Preservation Digital Object. A PDO faithfully records the current state of the real-world object, and in the same time, it can be a digital surrogate, and even, for some purposes, the substitution of the original artefacts.[1]

Képminőség szabványok a múzeumi digitalizálásban

IN ENGLISH

Képminőség szabványok a múzeumi digitalizálásban

Miért fontos a minőségbiztosítás?

Egy gyűjtemény digitalizálása hatalmas feladat. Rengeteg szakember összehangolt munkájára és komoly intézményi erőforrásokra van szükség hozzá. Azért is különösen fontos, hogy kollekció egyszeri, szakszerű digitalizálása során a lehető legpontosabb, ellenőrzött minőségű másolat készüljön el, mert minden későbbi munkafázis erre épül. Tehát a megfelelő digitalizálás tulajdonképpen az állományvédelmi szintű digitális objektumok (Preservation Digital Object) elkészítése, amelyek hitelesen rögzítik a tárgy aktuális állapotát, referenciaként használhatók, illetve a lehető legtöbb felhasználás céljára helyettesítik az eredeti műtárgyat. [1]

Rolex Budapest Boutique

Photo Wall for Rolex Budapest

Photo Wall and Interior Photography

Multi-row panorama for a 4.5×2.5 meters large backlit glass wall decoration of Rolex VIP lounge.
Architectural and interior photography for international marketing campaign, websites and brochures.

HUGO BOSS Budapest flagship store photography

The reconstructed Hugo Boss Budapest flagship store interior and exterior photography project for international marketing purposes. Fashion Street, Budapest.

Hugo Boss Budapest

For more information please reach out to us via this contact form: https://photography.hu/contact/

Képminőség-ellenőrzés cikkek

Első rész

Part one

Második rész

Part two

9600 dpi. Really?

Evaluation of detail reproduction, based on MTF and SFR curves

THE RESOLUTION

SFR-MTF (Modulation Transfer Function / Spatial Frequency Response)

MTF

SFR

Resolution measurement features of the Golden Thread System

The method and its scientific background

Interpretation of the MTF curve with Golden Thread software

Conclusion

Resources, links, further readings

Contact

9600 dpi. Tényleg?

Reprodukciók részletvisszaadásának értékelése az MTF és SFR görbék alapján

A FELBONTÁS

Image quality standards for cultural heritage digitization projects

Why the quality control is so important?

Képminőség szabványok a múzeumi digitalizálásban

Miért fontos a minőségbiztosítás?

Photo Wall for Rolex Budapest

Photo Wall and Interior Photography

HUGO BOSS Budapest flagship store photography

Photodesign Playground

Support

Recent Posts

Categories

Reprodukciók részletvisszaadásának értékelése
az MTF és SFR görbék alapján